4 ms·
That's true - but the important contrast is that no-one's claiming that static analysis tools are solely sufficient for code review. Despite the inflammatory he
by scubbo 2y ago
That's true - but the important contrast is that no-one's claiming that static analysis tools are solely sufficient for code review. Despite the inflammatory headline, I read this article (particularly the final section "Conclusion: People Still Matter") as trying to say "AI is one useful tool in your arsenal to _improve_ code review, but don't for God's sake rely on it solely or blindly" - trying to temper some of the dangerous enthusiasm.