3 ms·
Cyph – A cryptographically secure messaging and social networking service
- woofcat 2y agoHow is this any different than the other 1,000 "encrypted chat" solutions?
- nikolay 2y agoThis has been used by doctors and is not free - this is how I found it.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- rightisleft 2y agoMy doctor can barely use a mouse let alone comment on surveillance technology
- ldehaan 2y ago[dead]
- Halian 2y agohttps://www.cyph.com/pricing https://www.cyph.com/pricing
- jazzyjackson 2y agoI was intrigued by the claim that they are secure by virtue of their patented tech, so I looked up the patent https://patents.google.com/patent/US9906369B2 https://patents.google.com/patent/US9906369B2 Sounds like a trust on first use scheme so that you get a public key from the distributor, and use that to verify the application bundle on subsequent use. I actually do like this because it solves for a paranoia I have with password managers, in that they can claim all they want that decryption happens clientside but they're serving me a JavaScript bundle and how am I supposed to believe that isn't changed on the fly via supply chain attack? So at least this adds a step that the application code that is delivered from the server must be signed by the author. Edit: client is source-available (nonfree), I actually hadn't come across npm verify, so thanks for that https://github.com/cyph/cyph?tab=License-1-ov-file https://github.com/cyph/cyph?tab=License-1-ov-file
- buu700 2y agoExactly! And just to clarify, the `verify` script is a Cyph feature that I added to allow comparing a local reproducible build against the production build, not a general npm feature. Running `npm run verify` in any random JS project won't do anything unless the project happens to have a script configured with that name.
- proxynoproxy 2y ago“Cyph is the only encryption app that is secure to use in a web browser, thanks to our patented WebSign technology.” Run, don’t walk away from vendors making these claims.
- nikolay 2y agoMaybe their claim is a bit more valid than those of other systems with equally bold claims [0]. [0]: https://www.cyph.com/websign https://www.cyph.com/websign
- antisocialist 2y agoIt may be valid against closed source apps, but I don't see how it can be more secure than build-and-self-host OSS apps for private messaging.
- proxynoproxy 2y agoIMHO their claim is invalidated by appeal to patents. Patents are a sure fire way to ensure that even the most clever of cryptographic constructions is never used in the real world. Open is better than closed. Non-patented encumbered is better that encumbered.