Even if we buy that leetcode is good in general, what about for the increasingly more dominant variant, the ML/AI engineer? How can we even ban them using LLMs

Even if we buy that leetcode is good in general, what about for the increasingly more dominant variant, the ML/AI engineer? How can we even ban them using LLMs in their "ML-leetcode" problem when the problem is on LLM tokenization or something? Like, if I lose a candidate because they're experts at using cursor + claude to do their coding (i.e. they solve it by writing 3 prompts and filling in 2 errors which are easily spotted in a total of 10 minutes), despite them having NeurIPS caliber publications and open source code, did I filter out a fake grifter, or did I filter a top tier candidate? I just don't buy that leetcode style problems make any sense for anyone whose doing anything involving LLMs, and like it or not, increasingly large amounts of the cushy 500K/yr FAANG+ jobs will involve LLMs going forward.