4 ms·
> There is no burden of proof required to assert a hypothesis. This is how none of truth nor science nor security operate. In the scientific world, a hypothesi
by Sohcahtoa82 2y ago
> There is no burden of proof required to assert a hypothesis. This is how none of truth nor science nor security operate.
In the scientific world, a hypothesis that has no evidence is treated with skepticism.
In the rest of the world, it gets treated as fact, even as evidence against the claim pours in.
- the_optimist 2y agoWhy do you say something is treated as fact? For example, are either the ‘cheating’ or ‘no cheating’ hypotheses verifiable in any productive regard? There may be confusion between “absence of evidence” versus “evidence of absence.”