4 ms·
According to gadders the definition of ethical is apparently “what’s good for gadders personally”. I don’t see anything ethical about your take - i see national
by dilyevsky 2y ago
According to gadders the definition of ethical is apparently “what’s good for gadders personally”. I don’t see anything ethical about your take - i see nationalism and greed. Misguided at that btw because skilled immigration demonstrably is good for us and good for wage growth. I asked you to prove otherwise and you just gave me some econ 101 vibes crap
- gadders 2y ago>>According to gadders the definition of ethical is apparently “what’s good for gadders personally”. According to gadders the definition of ethical is apparently “what’s good for the host nation's developers”. Fixed that for you. I don't think workers wanting to maximise their pay is greed.