5 ms·
>Large language models can sometimes respond with non-sensical responses, and this is an example of that Uh, this was definitely not a nonsensical response. It
by damnesian 2y ago
>Large language models can sometimes respond with non-sensical responses, and this is an example of that
Uh, this was definitely not a nonsensical response. It's not hallucination. the bot was very clear about his wish that the questioner please die.
There needs to be a larger discussion about the adequacy of the guard rails. It seems to be a regular phenomenon now for the checks to be circumvented and/or ignored.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- smgit 2y agoI disagree. I think some people are just over sensitive and over anxious about everything, and I'd rather put up a warning label or just not cater to them than waste time being dictated to by such people. They are free to go build whatever they want.
- tiahura 2y agoLLMs don't wish.
- dylan604 2y agoregardless of the GP's humanizing use of words, the weasel comment from Google is really what was their point. of course, that's not what people here whitewashing LLMs as the greatest thing ever will want people paying attention to though, so we get comments like yours to distract.
- caekislove 2y agoA chatbot has no wishes or desires. Any output that isn't responsive to the prompt is, by definition, a "hallucination".
- animal_spirits 2y agoregardless of what is "really" happening under the hood, if this is model has any influence on the real world through robotics, this could lead to an actual fatality. Physical Intelligence has a robot with arms that can interact with the world. If a robot like this, or a more advanced robot like a car, ends up on the same thought pattern that this model did, it could make actions that can hurt people. - https://www.physicalintelligence.company/blog/pi0?blog https://www.physicalintelligence.company/blog/pi0?blog