> Then you should be surprised that turbo-instruct actually plays well, right? Do we know it's not special-casing chess and instead using a different engine (n

> Then you should be surprised that turbo-instruct actually plays well, right? Do we know it's not special-casing chess and instead using a different engine (not an LLM) for playing? To be clear, this would be an entirely appropriate approach to problem-solving in the real world, it just wouldn't be the LLM that's playing chess.