4 ms·

I'm a researcher in this area if anyone wants to have a proper conversation. I'm 95% convinced that the major powers of the world have recovered crashed/landed

I'm a researcher in this area if anyone wants to have a proper conversation. I'm 95% convinced that the major powers of the world have recovered crashed/landed non-human intelligence craft. Before anyone responds to this comment, I would urge you to watch this video of Majority Leader Schumer and rising republican leader Mike Rounds giving a soliloquy on the senate floor to try to pass their UAP Disclosure Act and ask yourself - why would two senate leaders put their credibility on the line to try to pass a bill that references non-human intelligence 21 times? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8a0P617nqw&t=93s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8a0P617nqw&t=93s And, I would urge you to read the bill. It's one of the most comprehensive pieces of legislations that has been put out this decade https://www.congress.gov/118/crec/2024/07/11/170/115/CREC-2024-07-11-pt1-PgS4943.pdf https://www.congress.gov/118/crec/2024/07/11/170/115/CREC-20...

fauria 2y ago
Non-human intelligence does not imply extraterrestrial intelligence.
- likeabbas 2y ago
  In the context of that bill, it does. > NON-HUMAN INTELLIGENCE.—The term ‘‘non-human intelligence’’ means any sen- tient intelligent non-human lifeform regard- less of nature or ultimate origin that may be presumed responsible for unidentified anom- alous phenomena or of which
  - progrus 2y ago
    That could be a test animal
    - likeabbas 2y ago
      Maybe if you would read the entire bill before commenting you'd realize that your comment is completely wrong.
      - oniony 2y ago
        No, it's your claim, onus is on you.
        likeabbas 2y ago
        I pasted a link to the bill for everyone to read. You're expecting me to paste the entire 64 page bill in a hacker news comment?
      - progrus 2y ago
        I’m not going to bother, this is misdirection. My guess is they found a room-temperature superconductor that can store incredible amounts of electrical energy, and the quantum drive from https://ivolimited.us/ https://ivolimited.us/ actually works.
        likeabbas 2y ago
        You really think the Senate Majority Leader would risk his reputation on a 60 page bill that references "non-human intelligence" 20+ times a misdirection? The only misdirection I see is your ignorance
  - dleary 2y ago
    You disagree with GP, and then to “back up” your disagreement you quote a passage that directly confirms GPs statement. What’s going on?
    - likeabbas 2y ago
      What part of the passage confirms GP's (who's GP?) statement? Again, I can't paste the entire 64 page bill in a hacker news comment. You have to do some effort to read the bill to figure out what they're talking about.
xnorswap 2y ago
I recommend that you step away from "research". Have you ever seen Congress debate laws around computing and the internet? Ever wondered how clueless they appear in that context? They're lawmakers, that doesn't make them sudden experts in a wide range of fields. They are susceptible to outlandish conspiracy theories.
- likeabbas 2y ago
  I'm not going to stop what I'm doing because some closed-minded person told me to. These politicians are not experts, but the witnesses that have testified under oath are. Lue Elizondo - GS15 officer at the DIA, who's last assignment was running Special Access Program for the National Security Council. David Grusch - GS15 officer at NRO then NGA who handled the Presidential Daily Briefing for the NGA (meaning he was cleared to thousands of SAPs to consolidate information and brief the president) [Karl Nell](https://www.linkedin.com/in/karl-nell-98203510/details/experience/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/karl-nell-98203510/details/exper...) - too many positions to list, but one of the most notable was being a senior technical advisor to the Army's future command. I don't disagree that congress gets lost in conspiracy theories, but almost never do people pandering those testify under oath in public, or privately to the intelligence committees or ICIG. You should open your mind and take a deeper look than the headlines.
  - 0points 2y ago
    You seem to assume that only you is interested in aliens. Let me remind you that many of us grew up with The X Files. Of course we paid attention. We just seem to be less gullible.
    - likeabbas 2y ago
      Why do you assume I'm gullible? just because I'm a bit more open-minded than you?
JKCalhoun 2y ago
> Before anyone responds to this comment Kind of a red flag already.... I'm certainly unconvinced by what "a few people say". I mean, "Extraordinary claims..." and all that — you'll have to do better than testimony.
deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
itishappy 2y ago
What are you researching?
ssalka 2y ago
idk why you are getting downvoted. Schumer's full UAP Disclosure Act (unfortunately most of it was amended away) is groundbreaking legislation IMO.
- likeabbas 2y ago
  It's one of the most comprehensive pieces of legislation in the last decade, and people just completely ignored it.

fauria 2y ago

Non-human intelligence does not imply extraterrestrial intelligence.

likeabbas 2y ago
In the context of that bill, it does. > NON-HUMAN INTELLIGENCE.—The term ‘‘non-human intelligence’’ means any sen- tient intelligent non-human lifeform regard- less of nature or ultimate origin that may be presumed responsible for unidentified anom- alous phenomena or of which
- progrus 2y ago
  That could be a test animal
  - likeabbas 2y ago
    Maybe if you would read the entire bill before commenting you'd realize that your comment is completely wrong.
    - oniony 2y ago
      No, it's your claim, onus is on you.
      - likeabbas 2y ago
        I pasted a link to the bill for everyone to read. You're expecting me to paste the entire 64 page bill in a hacker news comment?
    - progrus 2y ago
      I’m not going to bother, this is misdirection. My guess is they found a room-temperature superconductor that can store incredible amounts of electrical energy, and the quantum drive from https://ivolimited.us/ https://ivolimited.us/ actually works.
      - likeabbas 2y ago
        You really think the Senate Majority Leader would risk his reputation on a 60 page bill that references "non-human intelligence" 20+ times a misdirection? The only misdirection I see is your ignorance
- dleary 2y ago
  You disagree with GP, and then to “back up” your disagreement you quote a passage that directly confirms GPs statement. What’s going on?
  - likeabbas 2y ago
    What part of the passage confirms GP's (who's GP?) statement? Again, I can't paste the entire 64 page bill in a hacker news comment. You have to do some effort to read the bill to figure out what they're talking about.

xnorswap 2y ago

I recommend that you step away from "research". Have you ever seen Congress debate laws around computing and the internet? Ever wondered how clueless they appear in that context? They're lawmakers, that doesn't make them sudden experts in a wide range of fields. They are susceptible to outlandish conspiracy theories.

likeabbas 2y ago
I'm not going to stop what I'm doing because some closed-minded person told me to. These politicians are not experts, but the witnesses that have testified under oath are. Lue Elizondo - GS15 officer at the DIA, who's last assignment was running Special Access Program for the National Security Council. David Grusch - GS15 officer at NRO then NGA who handled the Presidential Daily Briefing for the NGA (meaning he was cleared to thousands of SAPs to consolidate information and brief the president) [Karl Nell](https://www.linkedin.com/in/karl-nell-98203510/details/experience/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/karl-nell-98203510/details/exper...) - too many positions to list, but one of the most notable was being a senior technical advisor to the Army's future command. I don't disagree that congress gets lost in conspiracy theories, but almost never do people pandering those testify under oath in public, or privately to the intelligence committees or ICIG. You should open your mind and take a deeper look than the headlines.
- 0points 2y ago
  You seem to assume that only you is interested in aliens. Let me remind you that many of us grew up with The X Files. Of course we paid attention. We just seem to be less gullible.
  - likeabbas 2y ago
    Why do you assume I'm gullible? just because I'm a bit more open-minded than you?

JKCalhoun 2y ago

> Before anyone responds to this comment Kind of a red flag already.... I'm certainly unconvinced by what "a few people say". I mean, "Extraordinary claims..." and all that — you'll have to do better than testimony.

deleted 2y ago

[deleted]

itishappy 2y ago

What are you researching?

ssalka 2y ago

idk why you are getting downvoted. Schumer's full UAP Disclosure Act (unfortunately most of it was amended away) is groundbreaking legislation IMO.

likeabbas 2y ago
It's one of the most comprehensive pieces of legislation in the last decade, and people just completely ignored it.