2 ms·
I was trying to give you a light/high-level overview of the problem of free reach (which, by the way, I’ve been advocating against for at least a decade if not
by angoragoats 2y ago
I was trying to give you a light/high-level overview of the problem of free reach (which, by the way, I’ve been advocating against for at least a decade if not longer). But if you don’t want to understand the problem beyond “censorship bad,” or respond to what I’m actually saying, I can’t help you. Take care.
- akimbostrawman 2y agoNice try taking the high horse after name calling and advocating for censorship. Maybe go this way first next time to appear less fascist.
- angoragoats 2y agoI'm sorry that you feel that way, but I stand by everything I said in all of my previous comments and I'm not attempting to correct, change, or cover up any of it. Nothing I said previously amounts to advocating for censorship and if you read it that way even after I attempted to clarify, it's your problem, not mine. If you have any specific questions about anything I said that appears contradictory to you, or if you'd like to discuss what I'm actually advocating for (regulation of free reach), I'm happy to have a discussion about it. If you want to stay angry and uninformed about it, that's your prerogative as well. Have a good day.