Comments like these are so prevalent and yet illustrate very well the lack of understanding of the underlying technology. Neural nets, once trained, are static!

Comments like these are so prevalent and yet illustrate very well the lack of understanding of the underlying technology. Neural nets, once trained, are static! You'll never get dynamic "through-time" reasoning like you can with a human-like mind. It's simply the WRONG tool. I say human-like because I still think AGI could be acheived in some digital format, but I can assure you it wont be packaged in a static neural net. Now, neural nets that have a copy of themselves, can look back at what nodes were hit, and change through time... then maybe we are getting somewhere