3 ms·
I don't agree with your "/s". You make a lot valid points. Why soften it by saying it's sarcasm?
by bediger4000 2y ago
I don't agree with your "/s". You make a lot valid points. Why soften it by saying it's sarcasm?
- dghlsakjg 2y agoThe sarcasm is for the crabs in a bucket mentality, and the idea that everything has to be about profits. It’s ok for government services to lose money. Just fund it properly at the legislative level, and then decide if subsidized services are appropriate. The US government has enough money that running a bunch of pit toilets in the woods shouldn’t be a challenge.