4 ms·
Exactly that. LLMs generate a lot of simple and dumb code fast. Then you need to refactor it and you can't because LLMs are still very bad at that. They can onl
by valenterry 2y ago
Exactly that. LLMs generate a lot of simple and dumb code fast. Then you need to refactor it and you can't because LLMs are still very bad at that. They can only refactor locally with a very limited scope, not globally.
Good luck to anyone having to maintain legacy LLM-generated codebases in the future, I won't.
- dartos 2y agoI’ve noticed LLMs quickly turn to pulling in dependencies and making complicated code
- skydhash 2y agoI'm sure they do great for scripts and other stuff. But the few times I tried, they always go for the most complicated solutions. I prefer my scripts to grow organically. Why automate something if I don't even know how it's done in the first place? (Unless someone else is maintaining the solution)