5 ms·

Oh, separate but equal? No.

• dangero 14y ago
  How is that separate but equal? Who is making anyone separate? I'm suggesting the government should treat everyone the same. My understanding of "separate but equal" historically had to do with separating students based on race into separate schools. If the government were to say, "OK, call it a marriage, call it whatever you want, but 2 people can form what we call a 'domestic partnership' that creates certain legal rights by filling out this form." How is that separate but equal?
  • pbiggar 14y ago
    I think it sounded like you were saying that the new rule would be only for same-sex couples, and that opposite-sex couples would continue to call it "marriage".
    • dangero 14y ago
      Ahh, I should have made that more clear the first time.