2 ms·
No, it's not. He was assuming that saddle wasn't a good fit for the author, when there's no evidence of that at all. In fact, he was assuming that it was a ba
by shiroiushi 2y ago
No, it's not. He was assuming that saddle wasn't a good fit for the author, when there's no evidence of that at all. In fact, he was assuming that it was a bad saddle purely because it's a narrow road bike saddle and not some wide, cushioned saddle you find on $100 bikes at Walmart. In short, the OP knows absolutely nothing about bike saddles or how they relate to human anatomy, and shouldn't give out advice about them.