4 ms·
I've played with this and I like the idea a lot. but I found that BDB sucks still and gets corrupted too easily. So Instead o've been using tokyo tyrant. It su
by ezmobius 18y ago
I've played with this and I like the idea a lot. but I found that BDB sucks still and gets corrupted too easily.
So Instead o've been using tokyo tyrant. It supports memcached protocol as well as HTTP and native client protocols.
http://tokyocabinet.sourceforge.net/tyrantdoc/ http://tokyocabinet.sourceforge.net/tyrantdoc/
Much better then memcachedb and serves the same purpose.
- chadr 18y agoDo you have any more info on the corruption? I have found bdb to be very reliable. I used it as the backend storage engine for Sun's LDAP server product.