> It could be “being a good producer” and “being a good judge” are different things Yes I agree with this in principle. Although in this case what "good" is, i

> It could be “being a good producer” and “being a good judge” are different things Yes I agree with this in principle. Although in this case what "good" is, is ill-defined - or rather different to everyone. The scoring each person performs is actually most directly a statement of utility to the scorer. That should probably go into the piece as an edit :-)