4 ms·
Or just have the AI generate new specific experimental setups and parameters that we can try and be like "oh yeah, we just made a room temperature superconducto
by polishdude20 2y ago
Or just have the AI generate new specific experimental setups and parameters that we can try and be like "oh yeah, we just made a room temperature superconductor".
Honestly given what we know about physics, the AI should be able to simulate physics within itself or deduce certain things we've missed.
- AnimalMuppet 2y ago> Honestly given what we know about physics, the AI should be able to simulate physics within itself or deduce certain things we've missed. If by "AI" you mean language models, then no, it will not "be able to simulate physics within itself". No way.
- polishdude20 2y agoOh no I mean if we claim we have an AGI and it's true, it should be able to do that. LLMs are not that
- AnimalMuppet 2y agoFair enough. And in fact, I think that's an interesting line to consider for determining if something is in fact an AGI.
- potatoman22 2y agoIt can simulate basic problems well enough when viewed as a black box. Give it one of Galileo's experiments.