3 ms·

> Here is an example of a task that I do not believe this generation of LLMs can ever do but that is possible for a human That’s possible for a highly intellig

• hatefulmoron 2y ago
  If you took the intersection of every human's abilities you'd be left with a very unimpressive set. That also ignores the fact that the small set of humans capable of building programming languages and compilers is a consequence of specialization and lack of interest. There are plenty of humans that are capable of learning how to do it. LLMs, on the other hand, are both specialized for the task and aren't lazy or uninterested.
• luckydata 2y ago
  does it mean people that can build languages and compilers are not humans? What is the point you're trying to make?
  • fragmede 2y ago
    It means that's a really high bar for intelligence, human or otherwise. If AGI is "as good as a human, and the test is a trick task that most humans would fail at (especially considering the weasel requirement that it additionally has to be faster), why is that considered a reasonable bar for human-grade intelligence.