4 ms·
What a stupid piece. We are making leaps every 6 months still. Tell me this when there are no developments for 3 years.
by fallat 2y ago
What a stupid piece. We are making leaps every 6 months still. Tell me this when there are no developments for 3 years.
- hatefulmoron 2y agoI'm curious, what was the leap after GPT-4? What about the leaps after that, given a leap every 6 months?
- Der_Einzige 2y agoSora was just one of the many…
- hatefulmoron 2y agoYour best example is something that doesn't even do the things that GPT-4 does, isn't available to use, and has seemingly only produced a few clips (some of which were edited). If it were one of many, I think you would name something better.
- zaptrem 2y agoO1, new Sonnet, all the music models and video models, the voice models like 4o, etc.
- hatefulmoron 2y agoThe music/video models are cool, but It's an apples to orange comparison with GPT-4. I don't think there's really any comparison of intelligence or "advanceness" between those models and GPT-4. I'm surprised to hear someone say that O1 and new Sonnet are "leaps", though. My impression of them is that they're qualitatively similar to GPT-4. Incremental improvements at best. I don't think the gap between GPT-4 and the new Sonnet is anywhere near as large as the gap between GPT-3 and GPT-4, for instance.
- epups 2y agoSome important landmarks since GPT4 was first released (not in chronological order): - Vast cost reduction (>10x) - Performance parity of several open source models to GPT4, including some with far fewer parameters - Much better performance, much larger context window in state-of-the-art closed source LLMs (Claude 3.5 Sonnet) - Multimodality (audio and vision) - Prototypes for semi-autonomous agents and chain-of-thought architectures showing promising avenues for progress