3 ms·
That's anthropomorphized AGI. There's no reason to think AGI would share our evolution-derived proclivities like wanting to live, wanting to rest, wanting respe
by bloppe 2y ago
That's anthropomorphized AGI. There's no reason to think AGI would share our evolution-derived proclivities like wanting to live, wanting to rest, wanting respect, etc. Unless of course we train it that way.
- logicchains 2y agoIf it had any goals at all it'd share the desire to live, because living is a prerequisite to achieving almost any goal.
- dageshi 2y agoAren't we training it that way though? It would be trained/created using humanities collective ramblings?
- HarHarVeryFunny 2y agoIt's not a matter of training but design (or in our case evolution). We don't want to live, but rather want to avoid things that we've evolved to find unpleasant such as pain, hunger, thirst, and maximize things we've evolved to find pleasurable like sex. A future of people interacting with humanoid robots seems like cheesy sci-fi dream, same as a future of people flitting about in flying cars. However, if we really did want to create robots like this that took care not to damage themselves, and could empathize with human emotions, then we'd need to build a lot of this in, the same way that it's built into ourselves.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]