I don't think a supposedly bad decision has to be answered with being snarky. A pull request, or a fork focused on reducing build times are actual net gains. Fr

I don't think a supposedly bad decision has to be answered with being snarky. A pull request, or a fork focused on reducing build times are actual net gains. From that poster's original name, seems like they went on and did just that, which is great I believe. At the very least, giving the original developer the benefit of doubt, or assuming their decision made sense under the circumstances they were in at the time, is IMO a better start than just public criticism.