3 ms·

>>Lol... someone apparently accepted the mRNA injections. It just boggles my mind that one of the greatest medical achievements of this century(so far anyway)

>>Lol... someone apparently accepted the mRNA injections. It just boggles my mind that one of the greatest medical achievements of this century(so far anyway) is being ridiculed on the internet. It's honestly the same as someone going in the comments section and saying that the earth is flat, after all just LOOK OUTSIDE SHEEPLE.

nixdev 2y ago
[flagged]
- gambiting 2y ago
  >>This "greatest medical achievement" was touted by the "mainstream" media as 100% safe and effective. It can still be the greatest medical achievement of our century and the media could have been lying about how safe it is. Penicillin was the greatest medical achievement of its time yet it isn't 100% safe to use. Nothing really is. What is stupid is people dismissing mRNA vaccines wholesale because they read how some articles written at the time of the pandemic weren't entirely true. >>this is why it is ridiculed, because it is and always was total bullshit. Just so we're clear, what do you mean as "total bullshit"? >>Why did they later tout it as 90% effective? Then 80% effective, then 70% effective, then 60% effective Who is "they"?
  - nixdev 2y ago
    [flagged]
    - gambiting 2y ago
      ">>and that they had an intended purpose different than what CNN/MSNBS etc would say they were for So what were they for? Admittedly I don't know what CNN said as I'm not american. >>which you will find has been 100% admitted by the "legitimate" voices if you bother to look Again, no offence, but this just sounds like my mum saying "I know this one doctor who works out of this hut in the woods, he really knows the truth about everything, everyone is lying". Just smells wrong if you know what I mean. The fact that you keep putting "legitimate" in quotes suggests they are anything but. >>In case you missed it, the "authoritative" voices have admitted that the mRNA injections did not prevent infection and did not prevent spread. But you know what, I'll freely admit that I might have completely missed such an admission from a major authority - care to enlighten me please? Also, I want to add one more thing - specifically Covid vaccines are one thing, we can keep debating them, but you seemed to make fun out of all mRNA vaccines, which to me is the crazy part. mRNA as a technology absolutely works and again, is a miracle of science(or you know....just science).
      - nixdev 2y ago
        "The mRNA injections" referred to the ones marketed for covid specifically. I did not, and would not, dismiss the use of mRNA gene therapies (that's what it is), categorically. > this just sounds like my mum saying "I know this one doctor By "legitimate" / "authoritative" voices, I am referring to "mainstream" media. I put "mainstream" in quotes because long-form podcasts and even Alex Jones himself have a larger audience than CNN/MSNBS etc. > I'll freely admit that I might have completely missed such an admission from a major authority - care to enlighten me please? I respect this sincere pursuit of truth, very much so. I will leave this thread open in a tab and bring resources I am aware of to you in the near future.
        hooverd 2y ago
        why would mRNA vaccines be ineffective compared to inactivated vaccines? the early western ones had better efficacy than sinovac
- Macha 2y ago
  Someone sets a tree on fire. The fire brigade comes and puts it out with a couple of buckets of water. Wow, isn't water great? The arsonists come back and douse the tree in petrol and set it on fire again. Now the water is less effective. Do you now think the water didn't help with the first fire?

nixdev 2y ago

[flagged]

gambiting 2y ago
>>This "greatest medical achievement" was touted by the "mainstream" media as 100% safe and effective. It can still be the greatest medical achievement of our century and the media could have been lying about how safe it is. Penicillin was the greatest medical achievement of its time yet it isn't 100% safe to use. Nothing really is. What is stupid is people dismissing mRNA vaccines wholesale because they read how some articles written at the time of the pandemic weren't entirely true. >>this is why it is ridiculed, because it is and always was total bullshit. Just so we're clear, what do you mean as "total bullshit"? >>Why did they later tout it as 90% effective? Then 80% effective, then 70% effective, then 60% effective Who is "they"?
- nixdev 2y ago
  [flagged]
  - gambiting 2y ago
    ">>and that they had an intended purpose different than what CNN/MSNBS etc would say they were for So what were they for? Admittedly I don't know what CNN said as I'm not american. >>which you will find has been 100% admitted by the "legitimate" voices if you bother to look Again, no offence, but this just sounds like my mum saying "I know this one doctor who works out of this hut in the woods, he really knows the truth about everything, everyone is lying". Just smells wrong if you know what I mean. The fact that you keep putting "legitimate" in quotes suggests they are anything but. >>In case you missed it, the "authoritative" voices have admitted that the mRNA injections did not prevent infection and did not prevent spread. But you know what, I'll freely admit that I might have completely missed such an admission from a major authority - care to enlighten me please? Also, I want to add one more thing - specifically Covid vaccines are one thing, we can keep debating them, but you seemed to make fun out of all mRNA vaccines, which to me is the crazy part. mRNA as a technology absolutely works and again, is a miracle of science(or you know....just science).
    - nixdev 2y ago
      "The mRNA injections" referred to the ones marketed for covid specifically. I did not, and would not, dismiss the use of mRNA gene therapies (that's what it is), categorically. > this just sounds like my mum saying "I know this one doctor By "legitimate" / "authoritative" voices, I am referring to "mainstream" media. I put "mainstream" in quotes because long-form podcasts and even Alex Jones himself have a larger audience than CNN/MSNBS etc. > I'll freely admit that I might have completely missed such an admission from a major authority - care to enlighten me please? I respect this sincere pursuit of truth, very much so. I will leave this thread open in a tab and bring resources I am aware of to you in the near future.
      - hooverd 2y ago
        why would mRNA vaccines be ineffective compared to inactivated vaccines? the early western ones had better efficacy than sinovac
Macha 2y ago
Someone sets a tree on fire. The fire brigade comes and puts it out with a couple of buckets of water. Wow, isn't water great? The arsonists come back and douse the tree in petrol and set it on fire again. Now the water is less effective. Do you now think the water didn't help with the first fire?