4 ms·
That’s interesting. In my tests of translation of formal speeches from Japanese to English, the latest versions of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini were all better t
by tkgally 2y ago
That’s interesting. In my tests of translation of formal speeches from Japanese to English, the latest versions of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini were all better than DeepL. While DeepL’s output wasn’t bad, the fact that the LLMs could be prompted in detail about the purpose of the translation and had sufficient context windows to maintain pronoun reference and other forms of cohesion made a significant difference.
- Rinzler89 2y agoExactly this. LLMs are more context aware than DeepL.
- pil0u 2y agoYou could add context to DeepL as well as easily, with the "context" parameter of the translation.
- tkgally 2y agoThanks for that clarification. I don't think that feature was available when I did my comparison tests a few months ago.