> for all the good they might do. > It's like arguing with a real life philosophical zombie. It is equally unpleasant to hear you argue with opinions not stat

> for all the good they might do. > It's like arguing with a real life philosophical zombie. It is equally unpleasant to hear you argue with opinions not stated in the comments. Almost as if you are picking a fight nobody as of yet is provoking you to pick. And the phrase "philosophical zombies" don't mean what you seem to think it means. > It's wild to me that half the global population is so remarkably good at reflexively, and without any critical thinking, reject the idea... I don't see much critical thinking in this sentence of the article either: "Plastic has already become a new substrate used by argonauts in the Anthropocene era to navigate in surface ocean waters, illustrating the urgent need to reduce plastic pollution in the ocean," Why does that illustrate the urgent need?