The accusations also seem unsubstantiated and ideological in nature. Eg > Mallaby said that Perkins' conception of international finance is "largely a dream" a

The accusations also seem unsubstantiated and ideological in nature. Eg > Mallaby said that Perkins' conception of international finance is "largely a dream" and that his "basic contentions are flat wrong" because "the poor don't always lose" when developing countries borrow money. It's not exactly an uncommon take to center conceptions neocolonialism around the World Bank and the IMF. This just seems like a Steven Pinker blunt rotation picking on the work.