> That's not general intelligence, that's gaming. In fairness, their approach is non-trivial. Simply asking GPT-4o to fantasize more examples wouldn't have wor

> That's not general intelligence, that's gaming. In fairness, their approach is non-trivial. Simply asking GPT-4o to fantasize more examples wouldn't have worked very well. Instead, they have it fantasize inputs and programs, and then run the programs on the inputs to compute the outputs. I think it's a great contribution (although I'm surprised they didn't try making an even bigger dataset -- perhaps they ran out of time or funding)