> If they think the site is unbalanced, then they’ve just made it worse. Great point, and I think that's totally true. However, an organisation has to make the

> If they think the site is unbalanced, then they’ve just made it worse. Great point, and I think that's totally true. However, an organisation has to make the judgement call between staying on a failing (as they see it) platform in an attempt to rescue it, and leaving for an alternative that is less flawed. Clearly the Guardian thinks they stand little chance in affecting X in any meaningful way.