4 ms·
>Definitely not, nobody does that. Except every proper Life-cycle assessment on carbon emissions ever.
by _Algernon_ 2y ago
>Definitely not, nobody does that.
Except every proper Life-cycle assessment on carbon emissions ever.
- Jerrrrrrry 2y ago>proper doing Scotsman-like lifting when the point was that these things are not considered, or are "externalities"
- albumen 2y agonot sure how that invalidates Algernon's point. These things should be considered, and are in a lot of LCAs.
- Jerrrrrrry 2y ago>should be considered, and are Not as much as they should be, was his point. Saying something is not proper is the No True Scotsman fallacy.
- gmueckl 2y agoJust define "proper" to mean "it is an analysis that considers the whole supply chain and would pass academic peer review".
- alwa 2y agoThose would count toward “Scope 3” emissions, right? https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-are-scope-1-2-and-3-emissions https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explaine...