2 ms·
It sounds like a pessimistic answer in the XXI century when we can see that science and engineering are really advancing in many directions. There is a context
by wslh 2y ago
It sounds like a pessimistic answer in the XXI century when we can see that science and engineering are really advancing in many directions.
There is a context on this [1].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_reprocessing_of_spent_nuclear_fuel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_reprocessing_of_spent...
[2] https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=reprocessing+nuclear&btnG= https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=repr...
- justinclift 2y agoAgain, we need actual solutions not wishful thinking. It's good that science is developing potential solutions to the problem. When (and if) they do come up with a good solution, then it will be the right time to consider the pro-nuclear approach.