> I never personally expected anything close to neologism out of LLMs, not sure whether that was a common expectation. You just described how LLMs have not "na

> I never personally expected anything close to neologism out of LLMs, not sure whether that was a common expectation. You just described how LLMs have not "nailed it" at being an "analog for the language center of a brain." Creating neologisms is something our language centers do. > They could absolutely create a novel idea when predicting what a person might say, but LLMs have no way of working through the logic behind the idea or modelling reality to see if the idea might work.... but at the end of the day humans would have to sift through testing or logically invalidating each option generated. That's not too different from a monkey at a typewriter.