3 ms·
> 16:9 But why[1]? [1]: https://www.benq.com/en-us/monitor/programming/rd280u.html https://www.benq.com/en-us/monitor/programming/rd280u.html
by genpfault 2y ago
> 16:9
But why[1]?
[1]: https://www.benq.com/en-us/monitor/programming/rd280u.html https://www.benq.com/en-us/monitor/programming/rd280u.html
- GrumpyYoungMan 2y agoThat battle has been lost. Dell's Ultrasharp U30xx 30" monitors were the last large 16:10 monitors I was aware of and it looks like Dell doesn't even make them anymore when I just checked.
- Sakos 2y agoEven those are only 2560x1600. At this point, I'd rather take any 16:9 4k monitor, unfortunately. I'd pay out the nose for a good 5k 16:10 monitor though.
- ywvcbk 2y agoWhy not? I certainly get 16:10 or even 3:2 on laptops but for a desktop just get a taller display (if there is truly not enough vertical space on 32” screen...).