2 ms·
Consistently with my point above, during these times I suggest to pick your sources according to the apparent quality of the writer - not stuck in the idea of e
by mdp2021 2y ago
Consistently with my point above, during these times I suggest to pick your sources according to the apparent quality of the writer - not stuck in the idea of editorial boards such as the historic one from The Economist.
Today the better technique seems to be "I will give my time to that author".
- BMc2020 2y ago"The problem of acquiring information reliably and efficiently remains important in all senses, including encumbrance." I don't understand what that sentence means. None of the uses at wikepedia seem to fit either: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encumbrance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encumbrance "An encumbrance is a claim made against a property by someone other than the current titleholder." Perhaps you meant the sixth sense, clairvoyance, not encumbrance?
- mdp2021 2y agoIt was "encumbrance" as "burden": I wrote "the problem remains important", i.e. it is "massively" significant, and also a "massive burden"; "important" as in "with priority" and as in "of uneasy volume". ("Important" contains an idea of "carrying something big".)