3 ms·
Stupid question but why can't it (non Pro particularly) be powered over USB C like a MBP, if it's so power efficient? Does it have extra performance that makes
by switch007 2y ago
Stupid question but why can't it (non Pro particularly) be powered over USB C like a MBP, if it's so power efficient?
Does it have extra performance that makes full use of the 155W input?
What would have it taken Apple to have given us the option to be powered by 100W USB C (eg the tech to downgrade power usage to match the power input)?
- physicsguy 2y agoI guess the inclusion MBP battery allows drawing higher current than a USB C power supply can provide?
- watermelon0 2y agoI think most of the 155W is for USB-C power delivery, not the machine itself. Blog post mentions that power usage during benchmark was at 42W.