3 ms·
That's wrong on two points. First, they haven't obfuscated that; it's not present at all. Second, your first step is that your hotel falsely inflates customer
by thaumasiotes 2y ago
That's wrong on two points.
First, they haven't obfuscated that; it's not present at all.
Second, your first step is that your hotel falsely inflates customer income. Then you follow up with some pointless additional steps. But if you can falsely inflate customer income, your job as a money launderer is already done. There are no additional steps. Spending revenue from your company on spurious invoices from another company is how you'd pay a bribe, not launder money.
- defrost 2y agoWhat was the scale of total income per month to wash again? You might want to dwell on the bookkeeping scale required to soak up that volume in a diffuse manner and then "legitimitely" consolidate that upwards.
- thaumasiotes 2y agoAs I recall, the scale was eight million dollars in one month. I'm with you that a sleepy rural hotel can't handle that. However, charging fraudulent expenses to the same sleepy rural hotel can't fix that problem. (It aggravates it!) The hotel can't spend more money than it has. And if you can make it look like the hotel has enough money to suit your needs, your job is already done. Fake expenses don't help. After a long time spent on various dramas related to this initial problem, the show addresses it by having Marty found a casino, which seems plausible.