3 ms·
Erratum: > Transactions may observe none, part, or all Should, I think, read: > Consumets may observe none, part, or all
by zbentley 2y ago
Erratum:
> Transactions may observe none, part, or all
Should, I think, read:
> Consumets may observe none, part, or all
- aphyr 2y agoBoth are true, but we use "transactions" for clarity, since the semantics of consumers outside transactions is even murkier. Every read in this workload takes place in the context of a transaction, and goes through the transactional offset commit path.
- zbentley 2y agoAh, got it; I was assuming that “transactions” was referring to the transactions mentioned as the subject of the previous sentence, not the transactions active in consumers observing those. My mistake!