> It's hard to guess what your argument is when you haven't plainly stated it. No. It's not. Unless you are not acting in good faith. > but that they don't m

> It's hard to guess what your argument is when you haven't plainly stated it. No. It's not. Unless you are not acting in good faith. > but that they don't matter because they are "old". It's not that it is "old". But as I said, egg prices have come down recently in the past month. Before spiking again. Your articles can be possibly account for the egg prices rising in the spring or the summer, but it doesn't explain why prices came down in the fall... and then spiking up again. > So, another 13M deaths (another 14.1% increase in total death count) since that May 2024 figure. And yet the prices came down in the fall. Go figure. > You could have done the web search I recommended and found these other links... It's not my job to do your work. > Yes, you are very mistaken. Well you are obviously invested in it for some reason. So you are obviously "something". > It would really help if you would plainly state your positions. Are you for real? You write like a political activist. > unless you are making an ad-hominem argument. Once again, projecting. "If you are intentionally muddying the waters or spreading disinformation, well then, shame on you." Wall of text after wall of text. Incredible. Have a nice day.