2 ms·
Show me an LLM that is doing any of the things you mentioned and furthermore I'm willing to bet none of that will be possible after ARC is solved either. How mu
by benchmarkist 2y ago
Show me an LLM that is doing any of the things you mentioned and furthermore I'm willing to bet none of that will be possible after ARC is solved either. How much money would you be willing to bet?
- naasking 2y agoNot sure what's so controversial, it's well known that LLMs can trivially be viewed as operating in higher dimensional space: https://gcptips.medium.com/a-geometric-perspective-on-large-language-models-23ec7e91c764 https://gcptips.medium.com/a-geometric-perspective-on-large-... As for generalizing to algorithms, LLMs don't yet do this as well as humans, but they do do it: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02390 https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02390 Finally, there's no intrinsic reason why an AI that can reliably solve deductive problems like ARC would be limited to two dimensions.
- benchmarkist 2y agoThen you have no reason to argue with me.
- naasking 2y agoThe only position I took issue with, and still do, is my closing paragraph of my last post. Your argument for why ARC solvers wouldn't generalize doesn't even make sense.
- benchmarkist 2y agoNo point in arguing. If you think it will generalize then there is no reason to convince random people on the internet that ARC-AGI solver will get you closer to AGI.