3 ms·
Granger's causality is a very restrictive and incomplete view of causality. Pearl's counterfactual system with do calculus is a more general way to think about
by JackeJR 2y ago
Granger's causality is a very restrictive and incomplete view of causality. Pearl's counterfactual system with do calculus is a more general way to think about causality. This SURD appears to be a souped up version of Granger.
- dccsillag 2y agoAnd the potential outcomes framework (Neyman-Rubin) is even more general :) Either way, Holland's 'Statistics and Causal Inference' paper (1986) is a nice read on the different frameworks for causality, especially in regards to Granger (&friends) versus do-calculus/Neyman-Rubin.
- throwaway81523 2y ago> Holland's 'Statistics and Causal Inference' paper (1986) In case anyone else wants to take a look: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2289064 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2289064 https://doi.org/10.2307/2289064 https://doi.org/10.2307/2289064