I read all your sentences and agree with them. Still I can't see how that changes my conclusion. The point of putting up disguises like these is that you think

I read all your sentences and agree with them. Still I can't see how that changes my conclusion. The point of putting up disguises like these is that you think it is possible that the enemy flies over the target with something which uses visual piloting (a crewed bomber, or a camera guided cruise missile or similar). A strike like that at the continental US at a military target like the Boeing assembly halls would either trigger an overwhelming conventional response (against foes without nukes) or would trigger a nuclear attack (against foes with nukes). The day the USA can't or won't do one of those responses is the day it lost the war. You might as well raise the flag of the attackers over the white house because it is over. (Which just to be clear is just a different way to say that it won't happen. The USA will strike back. Even if for some reason it is much diminished and literally fractured and cornered.) And since the foes also know this they won't send bombers against the Boeing factories. Because of the consequences that would entail.