3 ms·
how obnoxious can you be with constantly reposting these
by arccy 2y ago
how obnoxious can you be with constantly reposting these
- hu3 2y agowow! I thought you were exaggerating but on a quick glance, their presence in HN is mostly about criticizing Go.
- tapirl 2y agoI wrote many Go articles praising Go: https://go101.org/ https://go101.org/ I am neither a no-brainer Go hater nor a no-brainer Go lover. Good is good, bad is bad. All my articles/posts are based on facts.
- tapirl 2y agoI only post facts. :D
- arp242 2y agoYou need to stop doing this. It's now at the point where you're derailing every other Go thread with this. Quite frankly, it's becoming obsessive. I'm not saying you can never mention this, but you need to stop derailing every other Go thread. In many cases you post it more than once (two here). In other cases it's bizarrely off-topic (e.g. the Russ Cox resigning thread).
- tapirl 2y ago> You need to stop doing this. It's now at the point where you're derailing every other Go thread with this. This is not true. I haven't posted any comments in many Go threads. I only comment when it is related. And most gophers have not been aware of the problems of the new semantics of 3-clause "for;;" loops and it looks Go official don't have the intention to let them know. So I do it. I think this is good for the Go community.