What an utterly valueless “analysis”. The use of a word says nothing about context and without that you can say nothing about any imagined editorial stance. Th

What an utterly valueless “analysis”. The use of a word says nothing about context and without that you can say nothing about any imagined editorial stance. This simply conflates any use of a word with advocacy for a position. Even more tellingly we are supposed to think that saying things like “discrimination based on race and gender is unfair” constitutes an arguable position. The takeaway is that people like the author have entirely bought into a radical right wing position and somehow believe they are impartial observers.