4 ms·
>Why is Gimp failing to reproduce the successes seen by Blender? Blender is huge, Gimp is miniscule. One is part of GNU, and one isn't. Not even being flippan
by stackghost 2y ago
>Why is Gimp failing to reproduce the successes seen by Blender? Blender is huge, Gimp is miniscule.
One is part of GNU, and one isn't. Not even being flippant.
Being a GNU project brings with it all kinds of political baggage that gets in the way of developing good UI/UX.
- jeroenhd 2y agoIf Blender is what good UI/UX looks like then I'm glad GNU is here to protect us. Blender has the advantage that its commercial competitors are just as bad or worse. GIMP competes with everything from MS Paint to Photoshop so the standards are different. It also helps that Photoshop's bizarre non-standard UI has been taught for decades now. Access to some tools and features is a little better than in the ooen source versions but it's still a remarkably terrible UI for a tool used so commonly.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]