> You're doing a classic "you must not get it" bit when people find an attempt at humour stupid if not distasteful I’m not, the couple links I’ve seen here, in

> You're doing a classic "you must not get it" bit when people find an attempt at humour stupid if not distasteful I’m not, the couple links I’ve seen here, including this one, have been written as if the ads aren’t intended to be funny, and judge (and describe) them as if the ads are trying to straightforwardly communicate something, rather than being a particular common sort of humorous ad—and, perhaps, failing at what they’re trying to say and communicating the wrong thing, or being bad for other reasons, but that’s not how this piece comes across. I’m not wondering if everyone who doesn’t like them didn’t understand them, but whether the ones bothering to blog about it are misreading the ads? Has it just been the links I’ve happened to have followed on the topic here?