> Otherwise these claims from ARC-AGI are simply false: Currently, any claim about AGI other than "we're probably not anywhere close to strong AGI" is simply f

> Otherwise these claims from ARC-AGI are simply false: Currently, any claim about AGI other than "we're probably not anywhere close to strong AGI" is simply false. Of course a lot depends on one's definition of AGI. From another perspective, one could argue that ChatGPT 4 and similar models are already AGI.