4 ms·
It has been demonstrated time and time again that the simplest implements of war are always the most effective.
by Dalewyn 2y ago
It has been demonstrated time and time again that the simplest implements of war are always the most effective.
- glitchc 2y agoThis is a silly statement given that guns beat arrows and arrows beat rocks. I believe you meant something more specific. What we are seeing in Ukraine is a war of attrition.
- rtkwe 2y agoHas it? Small drones be they for surveillance, dropping munitions or for suicide runs seem like they've been quite effective in Ukraine.
- astrodust 2y agoUkraine has also been vigilant in making hyper-realistic wooden replicas of various types of equipment, some even including heating elements in them so they look correct on thermal cameras. If you've seen how glitchy/blurry the drone footage can get with jamming, it'd be easy to be fooled by a decoy.
- talldayo 2y agoYou'd think that. One of the biggest takeaways from WWI (and undeniable takeaways of WWII) is that complex weapons work better. Chemical attacks could kill thousands of men without risking a single life on the behalf of the attackers. Tanks and armored vehicles were protected from any of the simple implements that infantry could carry, and forced a complete rethinking of battlefield strategy. The concept of air superiority began to define who advanced on the ground, and the modernization of naval forces revolutionized the tactics used in standoff warfare. It's comforting to repeat humanist aphorisms like "war never changes" but the reality of the matter is that 100,000 people had never died so quickly in any age before the atom bomb.