4 ms·
GP started with the premise "we don't need one printed in the 21st century". A more generous reading of that argument might be "we don't need one authored in t
by calciphus 2y ago
GP started with the premise "we don't need one printed in the 21st century".
A more generous reading of that argument might be "we don't need one authored in the 21st century", not that textbooks would never need reprinting and last forever through two dozen owners
- rimunroe 2y agoD'oh! Thanks. I had indeed interpreted the person they were replying to as talking about authorship rather than printing …despite them saying “printed”
- Arnt 2y agoI'd have a problem believing that too, because I see that my oldest child's math textbook (for the last year before starting university) is better than my own was. Not very much, but enough to give me the impression that the textbook authors are paying attention to how their work is used and improving it (maybe by <0.1%) in each edition.