> This editorial choice suggests Wikipedia editors have exceeded their proper role as documentarians and entered into political judgment Wikipedia has mainly b

> This editorial choice suggests Wikipedia editors have exceeded their proper role as documentarians and entered into political judgment Wikipedia has mainly been edited as propaganda a tool for a long time. Though it's not so much propaganda for a particular organization or government (though a little bit of that happens), but the biases and opinions of its power users. Everyone should read Wikipedia with skepticism. Just imagine it was written by an obnoxiously opinionated newspaper comment section poster, and you should be fine.