>> He said that the path to artificial general intelligence (AGI) is clear > Have they shifted the definition that much, or is there something they’re not tell

>> He said that the path to artificial general intelligence (AGI) is clear > Have they shifted the definition that much, or is there something they’re not telling? My impression is that, based on traditional definitions, no one has the foggiest notion of where to head to achieve it. And if he’s suggesting that “creative use of existing models” is a path to AGI… wow, that’s gotta be a useless definition of AGI. It's likely they're taking cues from Musk's "Full Self-Driving" fiasco: make big promises, then when progress stalls, redefine the promises to match what you've built.