4 ms·
That's what I thought too. Why not raise the price in urban areas, where pollution is greater, as is the standard of living? Then throw in some more public tra
by yazzku 2y ago
That's what I thought too.
Why not raise the price in urban areas, where pollution is greater, as is the standard of living? Then throw in some more public transportation to make up for the difference. The lone white boy chugging gas in rural California and living paycheck to paycheck can probably take a break, and his emissions, I suppose, are largely irrelevant.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- toomuchtodo 2y agoBecause you can't target price increases due to refinery specifications around fuel composition. You can only encourage EV uptake (policies and subsidies) and destroy fossil fuel demand (impair the fossil fuel supply chain).
- johnnyanmac 2y agoYou mean the area where most of the ones at or slightly above the poverty line is? Why not just re-distribute more fentanyl while we're at it? It'll have the same effect.