> This appears to restrict phrases like “alternative to Rust”, “reimplementation of Rust”, and similar constructs. While such uses might be legal anyway, in my

> This appears to restrict phrases like “alternative to Rust”, “reimplementation of Rust”, and similar constructs. While such uses might be legal anyway, in my opinion, this sends a terrible message to the community. I disagree: I think this just specifies that you can't call a different, incompatible programming language Rust. I think I agree with most of the other points, though some seem like more oversights than intentional restrictiveness. However, I'm not sure they will yield on the event policy. This seems to be a standard that is being set across large open source projects.